David Dabydeens Rewriting of Turners Painting Essay

David Dabydeens Rewriting of Turners Painting - Essay Example st enjoys the self-acclaimed freedom of distorting the reality in order to work out another reality that is greater and that lies beyond the capability of plain eyesight. J. M. Turner’s (who was an abolitionist) primary purpose was to draw the viewers’ sympathy for the slaves. But either because the limitation of visual art or simply because he is not one of the slaved society, he has failed to delve deep into the core of a slave’s existence that is his cultural identity. But Dabydeen has to focus primarily on this particular but relative truth or meaning of the art, rather than simply rewriting it, while overcoming Turner’s limitation. Yet since a visual art is often subjected to multiple interpretations depending on the multiplicities of individuals’ viewpoints, throughout the whole rewriting the painting Dabydeen has to maintain a poetic abstraction of the visual imagery of the his poem. Indeed, for Dabydeen Turner’s art is not more than an objective reality, of the 19th Century, and a part of history that he interprets from his own viewpoint. Hence what Dabydeen deals more with the reality of Turner’s art is his subjective interpolation that evokes picture and imagination of a civilization out of an instantaneous portrayal of a singular reality that might have evaded Turner’s eye, that is, J. M. Turner as well as his society fails to perceive the cultural identity of the slaves. Dabydeen has tried to evoke a cult ural identity out of the forgotten past. Dabydeen views that the slave thrown into the sea is floating for â€Å"centuries†, and his memory of his origin has faded away, though not completely.

Dq 7 m9 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Dq 7 m9 - Essay Example As such, the modern concepts that involve ethics in organizations encompass related issues to the triple bottom line, fair-trade, corporate responsibility amongst others (Savitz & Weber, 2006). Business, non-profit, and governmental organizations have often been mentioning sustainability in their goals. However, measuring the extent under which business advocates for sustainable growth, or is being sustainable is quite difficult. In mid 1990s, Elkington had to determine sustainability by trying to encompass new frameworks that measure the performance in Corporate America. The accounting outlines triumphs beyond the traditional measures of profits and return on investments. It also achieves shareholder’s value to incorporate the social and environmental dimensions. The framework is the Triple Bottom Line. Therefore, in focusing on the all-inclusive investment results, in which case, it includes the performance in the scope of people, profit and the planet, the Triple Bottom Lin e reports becomes the vital tool that supports sustainability goals. It has had to enable the business and nonprofit organizations to adopt Triple Bottom Line sustainability framework to enhance evaluation of their performance. Such similar approaches have had the gain of currency with the governments at all levels (Elkington, 1997). The concept that the triple bottom line demonstrates is that companies or organizations are responsible for all their stakeholders, in which case it should be by balancing the responsibilities of the organization. This might involve all that is part of the company whether indirectly or directly, and the planet in which a human being lives. This approach of TBL observes the shareholders as part of the shareholder group, however, in only a part of it. If I would conduct a cost/benefit analysis with respect to continuing to support the TBL, then I will come to draw some conclusions. One measures the accomplishment of the business in provisions of the econo mic performance. If the business generates some sufficient returns of finance, including from investments, operating activities and financial activities, then the business becomes successful. The triple bottom line has had to take some criteria that assess the performance of the organizations, the economic, social, and environmental. By using the traditional method, and by basing the stakeholders approach, one measures the inflow and the outflow of resources from the business, in which case it includes cash and the finances, the liabilities, the assets and even the simplest definable business resources. This economic criterion will then determine the extent an organization generates in monetary value. It determines also the net worth of business at some point in time, which is a significant benefit to the organization. Measuring the social performance of the organization will be quite the difficult criteria. This criterion of the triple bottom line involves the taking into account t he influence of business on the people outside the business and those within the business. The principles of the triple bottom line on a business will play the role of benefiting the community and will ensure there is no exploitation of the people by the action of the business. Societal factors measured include the